<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" 
"/usr/share/xml/doctook/xml-dtd-4.1.2/docbookx.dtd"[

<!ENTITY timestamp SYSTEM "timestamp.txt">
]>

<!-- <!DOCTYPE articel PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DDT Simplified DocBook XML -->
<!-- V1.1b2//EN" -->
<!-- "/usr/local/xfc-12/xslu/config/sdocbook/dtd/V1.0/sdocbook.dtd"> -->

<!-- 
# File: /home/john/work/wpcug/documents/docs.xml
# Date: Tue Jun  1 20:38:41 EDT 2004
# Last Revised: Time-stamp: <2004-06-02 13:35:06 john> maintained by emacs
# Description: Documentation Galore 
# ======================================================================= 
 -->

<article>
  <articleinfo>
    <title> Documentation Galore </title>
    <abstract>
      <para> This talk will focus on the different types of
      documentation available on and for the Linux system. </para>
      </abstract>

    <author> 
      <firstname> John </firstname>
      <surname> Moore </surname>
      <othername role='mi'>F.</othername>
      <affiliation>
	<address> <!-- email -->
           <ulink url="mailto:john.wpcug@lions-wing.net">
            Mail to: John F. Moore from WPCUG </ulink>
        </address>
      </affiliation>
      </author>

    <copyright>
      <year> 2004 </year>
      <holder role="mailto:john.wpcug@lions-wing.net"> John F. Moore </holder>
    </copyright>


    <pubdate>Last Revised:  &timestamp; </pubdate>
    <revhistory>
      <revision>
	<revnumber> 1.0 </revnumber>
	<date> Tue Jun  8 20:45:21 EDT 2004 </date>
      </revision>
    </revhistory>
  </articleinfo>

  <sect1 id="introduction">
    <title> Help, Info, Howto, and more </title>
    <mediaobject>
      <imageobject>
	<imagedata fileref="tn_book3.jpg" format="JPG"/>
      </imageobject>
    </mediaobject>

    <!-- man pages, texinfo, FAQs, HOWTOs, Guides, Tutorials, Books. -->

    <para> Before there was help for Dos, before there was help in
    Windows, there were man pages.  The original documentation tool
    available on the Unix system was the Roff formatter.  This tool allowed
    the creation of on-line manual pages for the commands.  As we saw
    last week, the manual pages were only one of the formating options
    available to the document writer today. </para>

    <para> But man pages are not the only type of documentation on the
    Linux system.  One of the most common help systems, used by the
    GNU FSF (Free Software Federation) is know as <emphasis> Texinfo
    </emphasis>.  This Texinfo system was designed to be a hyperlinked
    system before web pages became common. The output of this system
    can be viewed using the Info program or a help mode which is
    integrated into Emacs. Additionally, the Texinfo pages can be
    converted to print using the TeX formatter. </para>

    <para> One of the information sources available for many programs
    is the documentation which comes with a particular application.
    This documentation is commonly stored in <filename> /usr/share/doc
    </filename>.  This documentation often takes the form of release
    notes, copy right information, and readme files.  In the past the
    information was held in <filename> /usr/doc </filename>.  </para>

    <para> Since Linux was born on the Internet, one form of
    communication common to most everyone involved in Linux is email.
    Often when a program becomes used by more than a small group of
    people, someone, usually the author, created a mail list for their
    application.  This is a good way for users to swap questions, tips
    and tricks on using the application in question. Generally after
    an email list has been in use for a while, some questions come up
    repeatedly.  Once someone notices this repetition, there is an
    effort to create a <emphasis> FAQ </emphasis> (Frequently Asked
    Questions) list.  This list tends to cut down on repeated requests
    for the same information.  It also tends to limit the amount of
    searching of the Email list archive.  </para>

    <para> Closely related to email is the <emphasis> Network News
    Transport Protocol (NNTP) </emphasis>.  This has gone somewhat out
    of favor due to the amount of traffic involved.  The system works
    like a news service where there is a server and you connect to the
    server.  </para>

    <para> The next type of help which I know about was the <emphasis>
    HOWTOs </emphasis>. These are step-by-step  explanations designed to
    provide a more complete understanding of how a particular topic
    works and how to configure the tools involved.  In addition to the
    step-by-step information, they usually contain discussions about
    how a particular system works. </para>

    <!-- TLDP guides  -->
    <para> At <emphasis> The Linux Documentation Project </emphasis>
    they also create longer more general guides, which they conveniently
    call guides.  These are based on more than a single subject like
    the Howtos. </para>

    <para> At a slightly higher level than the Guides, we come to the
    On-line Tutorials.  These are often complete books available on the
    Internet.  Many are aimed at the beginner, although there are more
    complex ones available on-line.  A good example is <ulink
    url="rute/index.html"> Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition
    </ulink> which is available in lessons. </para>

    <para> And not to be forgotten is the extensive list of books
    available from places like Amazon or Borders.   </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="tldp">
    <title> The Linux Documentation Project </title>
    <mediaobject>
      <imageobject>
	<imagedata fileref="ldp.gif" format="GIF"/>
      </imageobject>
    </mediaobject>

    <para> Before we start discussing the specific types of
    documentation, I would like to take a minute to talk about <ulink
    url="http://www.tldp.org"> The Linux Documentation Project
    </ulink>.  </para>

    <blockquote>
      <attribution> <ulink url="http://www.tldp.org/manifesto.html">
      Linux Documentation Project Manifesto </ulink></attribution>
 
      <para> The Linux Documentation Project is working on developing
      free, high quality documentation for the GNU/Linux operating
      system. The overall goal of the LDP is to collaborate in all of
      the issues of Linux documentation. This includes the creation of
      "HOWTOs" and "Guides". We hope to establish a system of
      documentation for Linux that will be easy to use and
      search. This includes the integration of the manual pages, info
      docs, HOWTOs, and other documents. </para>

      <para> LDP's goal is to create the canonical set of free Linux
      documentation. While on-line (and downloadable) documentation can
      be frequently updated in order to stay on top of the many
      changes in the Linux world, we also like to see the same docs
      included on CDs and printed in books. If you are interested in
      publishing any of the LDP works, see the section "Publishing LDP
      Documents", below. </para>

      <para> The LDP is essentially a loose team of volunteers with
      minimal central organization. Anyone who would like to help is
      welcome to join in this effort. We feel that working together
      informally and discussing projects on our mailing lists is the
      best way to go. When we disagree on things, we try to reason
      with each other until we reach an informed consensus. </para> 
    </blockquote>

    <para> I want to say a couple of words about the TLDP since it
    represents one of the strengths of Linux.  Linux came into being
    and continues today to be a community of volunteers who spend some
    of their free time working on software and documentation for the
    benefit of others.  This was best discussed by Eric Raymond in his
    famous piece, <ulink
    url="http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/">
    The Cathedral and the Bazaar </ulink>. </para>

    <para> Here is a quote from the beginning of the book: <quote>
    <emphasis> Linux is subversive. Who would have thought even five
    years ago (1991) that a world-class operating system could
    coalesce as if by magic out of part-time hacking by several
    thousand developers scattered all over the planet, connected only
    by the tenuous strands of the Internet? </emphasis>
    </quote></para>

    <para> The significance of this, to my mind, is the concept that
    people might give away a valuable resource, skilled time.  We are
    not discussing simple community service by kids.  We are talking
    about highly skilled developers and computer professionals who
    contribute a portion of their time and skill to develop and
    maintain a tool for use by everyone.  </para>

    <para> I know I have spoken about this subject before, but I think
    it bears repeating.  The community of people involved in Linux is
    truly awesome.  Awesome enough that some companies are willing to
    spend a considerable amount of capital to stop or subvert this
    community.  I hope I do not need to remind you of the DMCA, or the
    extended copyright laws, or the effort to create a <emphasis>
    Trusted Computing Environment</emphasis>.  Many of these are aimed
    directly at crippling or eliminating people's ability to use the
    Linux system.  </para>

    <para> The problem is that without a great deal of support from
    people like you and me, the Linux system could become history.  At
    a time when much of the rest of the world is trying to move
    into the information age, some companies are trying to shut down
    this threat to their profits.  I hate to sound like a prophet of
    doom, but as Linux continues to take revenue or even perceived
    revenue from some companies, there is more and more pressure on
    legislators to pass laws to restrict our use of Linux on our own
    computers.   </para>

    <para> Let me close this gloomy prediction by urging to get
    involved in the <ulink url="http://www.eff.org"> Electronic
    Freedom Foundation</ulink>.   If you would like to see some of the
    lies on the internet have a look at this commentary, <ulink
    url="http://www.lionshare.net/writings/walker/cathedral.html"> The
    Cathedral and the Bizarre </ulink>, or this commentary on Open
    Source and the MAC: <ulink
    url="http://www.macopinion.com/columns/macskeptic/00/07/07/"> The
    Cathedral and the Bizarre </ulink>.  I found these on Google when I
    misspelled Bizaar as Bizarre.  </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="man">
    <title> Man Pages </title>

    <para> Since the original formating used on the Unix system was
    Roff, lets have a look at the parts of a man page to see how they
    are created.  In these early documents, it was common for the
    author to place the formating commands into the text stream as it
    was typed.  Some of you might remember Word Star which used a
    similar system.  </para>

    <blockquote> <attribution> <ulink
    url="http://www.tldp.org/FAQ/LDP-FAQ/"> TLDP FAQ </ulink> </attribution> 
      <para> A man (Manual) page is a standard form of help that is
    available for many Linux applications and utilities. You can view
    man pages by using the man command. Many of the GNU utilities have
    a more detailed form of help, called info pages. You can view info
    pages by using the info command. </para>
      </blockquote>

    <blockquote> <attribution> <ulink
    url="http://www.injunea.demon.co.uk/pages/page203.htm"> Read That Manual!
    </ulink> </attribution> 
      <para> On any UNIX system the on-line documentation available
      from the man pages covers all the commands available, including
      the script languages. For Bourne it's usually between 10 and 15
      pages whereas for C Shell or Korne it's about 30 pages or
      more. ...  </para>

      <para> The other thing you must do is cultivate an ability to
      read through these man pages and understand the meaning behind
      the words. This is a trick that takes time, don't think for a
      moment that what is written in a man page is actually
      correct. It is simply someone else's idea of how to explain what
      is supposed to happen under known circumstances. Don't forget
      that it's rare for the code writer to be the documentation
      writer too. This ability will put you in good stead for
      negotiating the most troublesome passages. If it doesn't make
      sense the first time, change your view and look at it from
      another angle. Develop this skill well, it will pay dividends
      later. </para> 
      </blockquote>

    <para> This form of document is designed for a quick lookup of
    parameters and/or command line arguments.  Although these
    documents are not always easy for the casual user, they are often
    the most accurate available, since they are generally written by
    the developer who wrote the program.  I find it best to think of
    them as a quick reference.  One useful command for man
    pages is <command> whereis &lt;program&gt; </command>.
    This command will show you where the man page and the command live. </para> 
    
    </sect1>

  <sect1 id="texinfo">
    <title> Texinfo Pages </title>
    <mediaobject>
      <imageobject>
	<imagedata fileref="gnu-head-sm.jpg" format="JPG"/>
      </imageobject>
    </mediaobject>

    <para> The Texinfo pages were designed as a way of combining text
    for on-line viewing and printed documentation.  Now I know that
    sounds like what you have today with web pages, but Texinfo
    predates web pages. </para>

    <blockquote> <attribution> <ulink
    url="http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/index.html">GNU
    Texinfo 4.7 </ulink> </attribution> 

    <para> A bit of history: in the 1970's at CMU, Brian Reid
    developed a program and format named Scribe to mark up documents
    for printing.  It used the `@' character to introduce commands, as
    Texinfo does.  Much more consequentially, it strived to describe
    document contents rather than formatting, an idea wholeheartedly
    adopted by Texinfo.  </para> 

    <para> Meanwhile, people at MIT
    developed another, not too dissimilar format called Bolio.  This
    then was converted to using TeX as its typesetting language:
    BoTeX.  The earliest BoTeX version seems to have been 0.02 on
    October 31, 1984.  </para> 

    <para> BoTeX could only be used as a
    markup language for documents to be printed, not for on-line
    documents.  Richard Stallman (RMS) worked on both Bolio and BoTeX.
    He also developed a nifty on-line help format called Info, and
    then combined BoTeX and Info to create Texinfo, a mark up language
    for text that is intended to be read both on-line and as printed
    hard copy. </para></blockquote>

    <para> The Texinfo format is interesting in that it contains a
    hyper text type linkage which predates the web.  I know you think,
    what's the big deal since we deal with Web pages so much today.
    But it is still impressive in it's own way.  Lets look at part of
    a header for the source file.</para>

    <example>
      <title> Sample Texinfo File Beginning </title>

      <programlisting>
     \input texinfo   @c -*-texinfo-*-
     @c %**start of header
     @setfilename infoname.info
     @settitle name-of-manual version
     @c %**end of header
     
     @copying
     This manual is for program, version version.
     
     Copyright @copyright{} years copyright-owner.
     
     @quotation
     Permission is granted to ...
     @end quotation
     @end copying
     
     @titlepage
     @title name-of-manual-when-printed
     @subtitle subtitle-if-any
     @subtitle second-subtitle
     @author author
     
     @c  The following two commands
     @c  start the copyright page.
     @page
     @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
     @insertcopying
     
     Published by ...
     @end titlepage
     
     @c So the toc is printed at the start.
     @contents
     
     @ifnottex
     @node Top
     @top title
     
     @insertcopying
     @end ifnottex
     
     @menu
     * First Chapter::    Getting started ...
     * Second Chapter::          ...
      ...
     * Copying::          Your rights and freedoms.
     @end menu
     
     @node First Chapter
     @chapter First Chapter
     
     @cindex first chapter
     @cindex chapter, first
     ...
      </programlisting>
    </example>

    <para> The strength of this format is that it can be transformed
    into a Man page, an Info page, a HTML page, and/or a TeX format.  We will see
    later another format which allows these type of translations, ie
    XML.  But from the author's point of view this is a much simpler
    format to work with.  To see what Info pages look like on the Web
    have a look at <ulink
    url="http://www.bernstein-plus-sons.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/yaya/info2html?(dir)Top">
    Info (Dir) </ulink> which is the Directory or top page in Info
    terms. </para>

    </sect1>

  <sect1 id="docs">
    <title> Program Documentation </title>

    <para> The documentation which comes with a program 
    can vary from only release notes, to full blown documentation. As
    example lets look at two programs: <command>apmd</command> and
    <command>aspell</command>. </para>

    <example>
      <title> Directory list of apmd-3.0.2 </title>
      <programlisting>
	apmd-3.0.2
	|-- ANNOUNCE
	|-- ChangeLog
	|-- LSM
	|-- README
	`-- README.transfer

	0 directories, 5 files
    </programlisting>
    </example>

    <example>
      <title>Directory listing for </title>
      <programlisting>
	aspell-0.33.7.1
	|-- README
	|-- TODO
	|-- man-html
	|   |-- 1_Introduction.html
	|   |-- 2_Getting.html
	|   |-- 3_Basic.html
	|   |-- 4_Managing.html
	|   |-- 5_Customizing.html
	|   |-- 6_Writing.html
	|   |-- 7_Adding.html
	|   |-- 8_How.html
	|   |-- A_Changelog.html
	|   |-- About_this.html
	|   |-- B_Do.html
	|   |-- C_Support.html
	|   |-- Contents.html
	|   |-- D_Credits.html
	|   |-- E_Glossary.html
	|   |-- F_Copyright.html
	|   |-- contents.png
	|   |-- crossref.png
	|   |-- index.html
	|   |-- manual.css
	|   |-- manual.html
	|   |-- next.png
	|   |-- next_g.png
	|   |-- prev.png
	|   |-- prev_g.png
	|   |-- up.png
	|   `-- up_g.png
	|-- man-text
	|   |-- 1_Introduction.txt
	|   |-- 2_Getting.txt
	|   |-- 3_Basic.txt
	|   |-- 4_Managing.txt
	|   |-- 5_Customizing.txt
	|   |-- 6_Writing.txt
	|   |-- 7_Adding.txt
	|   |-- 8_How.txt
	|   |-- A_Changelog.txt
	|   |-- About_this.txt
	|   |-- B_Do.txt
	|   |-- C_Support.txt
	|   |-- Contents.txt
	|   |-- D_Credits.txt
	|   |-- E_Glossary.txt
	|   |-- F_Copyright.txt
	|   |-- index.txt
	|   `-- manual.txt
	|-- manual.dvi
	|-- manual.tex
	`-- manual2.lyx

	2 directories, 50 files
      </programlisting>
    </example>

    <para> You will notice that for apmd there are only a few 
    files.  This is considered a minimal list of file, with the
    exception of README.transfer.  LSM is basically the information
    you would get from doing a package info on an RPM package. </para>

    <para> Aspell on the other hand contains a complete copy of a
    manual in Tex, Lyx, and DVI as well as the same manual in both
    Text and HTML.  </para>

    <para> I have noticed this documentation is often overlooked because
    people do not realize it even exists.  As an example I went to the
    directory <command>/usr/share/doc</command> on this computer and
    tried to see how many html files exist.  It came back with 4357
    pages.  On my server at home I tried the same command and came up
    with: 9913 pages.  So you see what I mean about it being over
    looked.  Even I did not realize how much good information was
    present in these directories. </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="faq">
    <title> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) </title>
    <mediaobject>
      <imageobject>
	<imagedata fileref="library.jpg" format="JPG"/>
      </imageobject>
      <caption>
	<para>Internet FAQ Archives</para>
      </caption>
    </mediaobject>

    <para> The FAQ is one of the most useful tools when you don't know
    where to look for answers to a particular question.  The reason to
    use an FAQ instead of emailing a project group, is that some
    groups can be openly hostile to people asking the same questions
    over and over.  Often you will get the response RTFM (Read The
    F.... Manual)  F is defined as fine or just f...in,  depending on the
    author. </para>

    <para> So the real question with an FAQ is where to find them.
    One source of some is <ulink
    url="http://www.linux.org/docs/faq.html"> Frequently Asked
    Questions (FAQs) </ulink> or <ulink
    url="http://www.tigerteam.net/linuxgroup/linux-admin-FAQ/Linux-Admin-FAQ.html">
    Linux Administrators FAQ List </ulink>, or probably best is to go
    to <ulink url="http://www.faqs.org/faqs/"> Internet FAQ Archives
    </ulink>. </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="nntp">
    <title> Network News Transport Protocol (NNTP) </title>

    <para> The network news is an interesting application of the
    network using an email like interface.  The way network news works is
    that each server sets up an NNTP service.  This service then
    communicates with all other sites it has on it's list and
    exchanges posts with them.  </para>

    <blockquote>
      <attribution><ulink
      url="http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/x-087-2-news.usenet.html">
      What Is Usenet, Anyway? </ulink></attribution>
      <para> One of the most astounding facts about Usenet is that it
      isn't part of any organization, nor does it have any sort of
      centralized network management authority. In fact, it's part of
      Usenet lore that except for a technical description, you cannot
      define what it is; at the risk of sounding stupid, one might
      define Usenet as a collaboration of separate sites that exchange
      Usenet news. To be a Usenet site, all you have to do is find
      another Usenet site and strike an agreement with its owners and
      maintainers to exchange news with you. Providing another site
      with news is called feeding it, whence another common axiom of
      Usenet philosophy originates: <emphasis>Get a feed, and you're
      on it.</emphasis> </para>

      <para> The basic unit of Usenet news is the article. This is a
      message a user writes and <emphasis> posts </emphasis> to the
      net. In order to enable news systems to deal with it, it is
      prepended with administrative information, the so-called article
      header. It is very similar to the mail header format laid down
      in the Internet mail standard RFC-822, in that it consists of
      several lines of text, each beginning with a field name
      terminated by a colon, which is followed by the field's
      value.[1] </para>

      <para> Articles are submitted to one or more newsgroup. One may
      consider a newsgroup a forum for articles relating to a common
      topic. All newsgroups are organized in a hierarchy, with each
      group's name indicating its place in the hierarchy. This often
      makes it easy to see what a group is all about. For example,
      anybody can see from the newsgroup name that
      comp.os.linux.announce is used for announcements concerning a
      computer operating system named Linux. </para>

      <para> These articles are then exchanged between all Usenet
      sites that are willing to carry news from this group. When two
      sites agree to exchange news, they are free to exchange whatever
      newsgroups they like, and may even add their own local news
      hierarchies. For example, groucho.edu might have a news link to
      barnyard.edu, which is a major news feed, and several links to
      minor sites which it feeds news. Now Barnyard College might
      receive all Usenet groups, while GMU only wants to carry a few
      major hierarchies like sci, comp, or rec. Some of the downstream
      sites, say a UUCP site called brewhq, will want to carry even
      fewer groups, because they don't have the network or hardware
      resources. On the other hand, brewhq might want to receive
      newsgroups from the fj hierarchy, which GMU doesn't carry. It
      therefore maintains another link with gargleblaster.com, which
      carries all fj groups and feeds them to brewhq. </para> 
    </blockquote>

    <para> This service allows non-interactive exchanges of ideas or
    views using threads.  If you are familiar with an email list where
    one questions is followed by answers, which sometime lead to
    entire discussions, you have a picture of what a news thread looks
    like.  </para>

    <para> In the past I used to use a program called slrn to read
    network news.  But one of the best interfaces today is <ulink
    url="http://groups.google.com/grphp?hl=en&amp;tab=wg&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8">
    Google Groups</ulink></para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="howto">
    <title> HOWTOs </title>

    <blockquote>
      <attribution><ulink url="http://www.tldp.org/FAQ/LDP-FAQ/">
      Linux Documentation Project (LDP) FAQ </ulink></attribution>
      <para> A HOWTO is usually a step-by-step guide that describe, in
      detail, how to perform a specific task. For example, you can use
      the Linux Installation HOWTO to help you install Linux on a
      system, but it does not cover how to set up a Web server so that
      you can focus on a particular task. </para>
    </blockquote>

    <para> The HOWTOs are one of the most useful information sources,
    in my opinion.  The reason is that they not only explain how to
    configure some software, they often explain how it works.  For
    example the HOWTO Network-Introduction includes an explanation of
    the following protocols.</para>

    <itemizedlist>
      <listitem>
	<para> 3. Networking protocols

          <itemizedlist>
	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.1 TCP/IP</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.2 TCP/IP version 6</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.3 IPX/SPX</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.4 AppleTalk Protocol Suite</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>      3.5 WAN Networking: X.25, Frame-relay, etc...</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.6 ISDN</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.7 PPP, SLIP, PLIP</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.8 Amateur Radio</para>
	    </listitem>

	    <listitem>
	      <para>     3.9 ATM</para>
	    </listitem>
	  </itemizedlist>
        </para>
      </listitem>
    </itemizedlist>

    <para> These explanations are designed to lay the foundation for
    the application to be setup.  Now these guides are good but
    remember that the writers are not professional writers.  Some are
    good and clear but others are not.  Do not be discouraged if the
    explanation is not great, but contribute to the process by
    offering constructive criticism to the author.  The contact
    information is usually provided at the beginning of the document.
    </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="guide">
    <title> Guides. </title>

    <blockquote>
      <attribution><ulink url="http://www.tldp.org/FAQ/LDP-FAQ/">
      Linux Documentation Project (LDP) FAQ </ulink></attribution>
      <para> A guide is typically a longer book with broader coverage
      of a subject; for instance, the Network Administration or User
      Guide. The intent is to understand the whole subject, as opposed
      to performing only one task. If you want to have a broader look
      at some aspect of Linux, then the guides should be very handy. </para>
    </blockquote>

    <para> The guides more closely resemble a book than anything
    else.  These documents cover a range of topics of interest to one
    class of users.  For example the quote above about Usenet came
    from the <ulink
    url="http://www.faqs.org/docs/linux_network/index.html"> Network
    Administrators guide </ulink>  </para>

    <para> Current the Linux Documentation Project lists 22 Guides
    which can be obtained <ulink
    url="http://www.tldp.org/guides.html">Here.</ulink> </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="tutorial">
    <title> On-line Tutorials </title>
    <mediaobject>
      <imageobject>
	<imagedata fileref="linux.gif" format="GIF"/>
      </imageobject>
    </mediaobject>

    <para> I suppose one question would be what is the difference
    between a Guide, such as the one listed above and an on-line
    Tutorial?  The only answer  I can provide is that the on-line
    tutorials are often written for a specific group of users.
    </para>

    <para> As an interesting view lets list 4 on-line tutorial.  These
    were from a listings at <ulink
    url="http://www.google.com/linux?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=beginners+tutorial&amp;btnG=Google+Search">
    Google Linux </ulink> when searching for <emphasis> Beginners
    Tutorial </emphasis></para>

    <itemizedlist>
      <listitem>
	<para><ulink url="http://linux.org.mt/article/terminal"> The
	Linux Terminal - a Beginners' Bash </ulink></para>

	<para>This tutorial presents the Linux terminal and the "bash"
	shell to people who have never used a command line to give
	commands to an operating system before, or who have never done
	so in Linux/Unix. People who have already used a Unix shell
	before might find it a bit simple.</para> 
      </listitem>

      <listitem>
	<para><ulink
	url="http://www.chrisranjana.com/freebsd-handbook-documentation/index.html">
	FreeBSD Handbook</ulink></para>

	<para> The FreeBSD newcomer will find that the first section
	of this book guides the user through the FreeBSD installation
	process and gently introduces the concepts and conventions
	that underpin UNIX®. Working through this section requires
	little more than the desire to explore, and the ability to
	take on board new concepts as they are introduced.</para> 
      </listitem>

      <listitem>
	<para><ulink url="http://www.linux.org/lessons/beginner/">
	Getting Started with Linux - Introduction</ulink></para> 

	<para> Welcome to Linux Online's Getting Started with Linux
	beginner level course. If you're new to Linux and want to find
	out how to use the fastest growing operating system today, all
	you have to do is follow these lessons and you'll be using
	Linux efficiently in no time. </para>

	<para> Getting Started with Linux is designed as a self-study
	course. We're afraid that due to the numbers of people who
	follow this course, we cannot answer any specific questions or
	clear up any doubts you may have about the material. In short,
	there is no extra help available. You are on your own. </para> 
      </listitem>

      <listitem>
	<para><ulink
	url="http://www.start-linux.com/topics/topic_54.php"> Start
	Linux - Beginners</ulink></para>

	<para> A short introduction to what Linux is. </para>
      </listitem>
    </itemizedlist>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="books">
    <title> Paper Books </title>
    <mediaobject>
      <imageobject>
	<imagedata fileref="oreilly_header2.gif" format="GIF"/>
      </imageobject>
    </mediaobject>

    <para> So we have finally come to the printed word.  Even though
    we have discussed a great deal of on-line sources of information,
    but this should not prejudice you against printed books.  </para>

    <para> One of my favorite sources for books is <ulink
    url="http://linux.oreilly.com/">O'Reilly Unix/Linux </ulink>.
    O'Reilly has made a business of publishing some of the best
    technical reference books available anywhere.  They have gained
    the trust of computer developers by a combination of good
    reference information, knowledgeable authors, and a willingness to work with their users.
     A good example is this document.  It is written in DocBook XML
    which was developed at O'Reilly and then made available to the
    world at large.  I have found that many of the developers I know
    own several O'Reilly books.  </para>

    <para> The real point is that despite the quantity of on-line
    documentation available, there is still a market for the
    professional writers who produce books.  The paper book is not
    less in demand, it might be that they are in more demand.  The
    paper book is still the standard since it is portable, allows you
    to make notes in the corners, and gives you something to place
    beside your computer when you work.  </para>

    <para> Now I know I have been talking up O'Reilly because I think
    they are the best, but there are good books from other
    publishers.  For example I went to the books section of Amazon and
    did a search for Linux books.  The search returned  3907 hits.
    Now I know that some of them will be trivial, some aimed at
    specific user groups, and some worthless.  But if even 10% are
    good that is 390 titles to choose from.  I suppose the real test
    is which ones are right for you.  </para>

    <para> So how do you determine which books are best for you.  Well
    the first thing I often do is to go to Borders and read parts of
    the books.  Since they allow browsing it give me a better idea of
    how the book treats a topic.  I find I pick some subject I am
    familiar with and read what they say about it.  If you don't
    already have the knowledge of one of the subjects.  Read the
    summary of a topic you are interested in and see if it is clear to
    you.  </para>

    <para> When it comes to books which are not available at my local
    Borders, I try to read the reviews, and if I am lucky, parts of
    the book, especially the table of contents.  I can often get a
    feel for the contents of the book by seeing what topics the author
    has put in the table of contents.  </para>

    <para> There is not good yard stick for what is best for you.
    Unfortunately the only true way to find out how good some books
    are is to buy them and see.  </para>

  </sect1>

  <sect1 id="wrap-up">
    <title> Conclusions </title>

    <para> Well I think this about summarized the documentation for
    Linux that I know about.  This does not mean that I have exhausted
    all the possible sources of information on Linux.  </para>

    <para> Next month we will look into how to find help for questions
    in Linux.  Even though I have tried to point out all the sources
    of information, there will always be questions which are not
    covered.  For those questions we will find out how to search out
    answers. </para>

    <para> This write up was done using DocBook XML instead of
    writing directly to HTML as in the past.  It made it more
    difficult to write, but hopefully it will be more flexible when it
    comes to build a search engine or maintain the web site.  For
    those of you curious, you can see the original source here: <ulink
    url="docs.xml"> Documentation Galore Source</ulink>.  And the
    shell script <ulink url="process.sh">process.sh</ulink> is here
    for you to examine.  </para>

    <para> One last thing, this document is now using XHTML instead of
    the traditional HTML.  If your browser has trouble displaying it
    please let me know.  As with many new experiments, it might not
    work for everyone and I can fix this in the future.</para>

  </sect1>





</article>